The news that Google was moving toward personalizing search results a few weeks ago has produced a bit of worry among some search marketers. After all, when the search results are different for everyone, how to you work on increasing the rankings of the site you are optimizing. With those concerns in mind, Gord Hotchkiss sat down to speak with Matt Cutts about how Google"s plans to tailor search results to the searcher might impact the future of search engine optimization.
The interview is full of interesting observations from both Matt and Gord.
[Matt]Personalization is one of those things where, if you look down the road a few years, having a search engine that is willing to give you better results because it can know a little bit more about what your interests are, that"s a clear win for users, and so it"s something that SEO"s can probably predict that they"ll need to prepare for. At the same time, any time there"s a change, I understand that people need some time to adjust to that and need some time to think, "How is this going to affect me? How is this going to affect the industry? And what can I do to benefit from it?"
Of course, the big question is how the lack of a monolithic set of search results will impact the reverse engineering that is typical in SEO. How do you reverse engineer something that"s different for everyone who sees it?
and...
[Matt]If we had the ability to say someone is searching for Palo Alto or someone is searching for Kirkland or Redmond and give them local newspapers, truly local newspapers, that would be a good win for users as well. So over time, I would expect search results to serve a broader and broader array of services. The idea of a monolithic set of search results for a generic term will probably start to fade away...
and...
[Gord]If personalization makes the search experience better, as I believe it will when it"s fully implemented, it marks a dramatic competitive advantage. In a market as hotly contested as search is, I still believe that the amount of personalization that appears on the search results page will continue to grow, likely faster than Google is anticipating right now.
Personally, I"m looking forward to the growth of personalized search. Not only will it force search engines to learn how to provide even better search results, it will also make reverse engineering the search results much more difficult. This will mean that the marketers that focus on building search friendly web sites that are full of good content and that figure out unique ways to promote them (via viral marketing, blog marketing, link baiting, etc...) will rise to the top in the areas where they should. It will help marketers begin to focus more on the long-tail of search and less on hitting the super-competitive phrases that send plenty of traffic, but very few buyers.
Basically, it will help move the industry away from magic formulas and toward creative marketing that relies on common sense and true understanding of the customer.
Matt comments on the shift from money phrases as well.
[Matt]here are so many people who think if I ranked number one for my trophy phase I win or my life will be good. When, in fact, numerous people demonstrated that if you chase after the long tail and make a good site that can match many, many different users" queries you might end up with more traffic than if you had that trophy phrase.
Gord follows this up with an excellent point about the upcoming need to shift toward focusing more on the user than the search engine. While search marketers have long pointed out the need for that line of thinking, the stark reality of search is that most web sites DO end up focusing more on the search engine than on the visitor, leading to good search results and poor conversion rates.
[Gord]...you have to start focusing on the user. Right now the basis of most search marketing campaigns is a list of key phrases. We don"t really pay any attention to the people who may be using those phrases, because we can focus on the phrase itself.
>>Source Link
>>Blog: Search Engine Guide : Small Business Search Marketing
>>Publish Date: 3/6/2007 8:03:38 AM
>>Keywords: search matt
Related Posts
>>Powerset"s search technology scoop, may scare Google (Matt Marshall/VentureBeat) #
Powerset"s search technology scoop, may scare Google — Powerset, a San Francisco search engine company, will announce Friday it has won exclusive rights to significant search engine technolog
>>Personalization, SEO, and Web Marketing #
Gord Hotchkiss recently interviewed Matt Cutts in a discussion that focused on personalization and the future of SEO. Kevin Newcomb also comments on this in Search Engine Watch. I also think that per
>>Google, WMW React on Redirected Results Debate #
Matt Cutts, head of Google"s web spam team, has followed-up on the debate that erupted around the way WebmasterWorld served pages. In a nutshell, the WebmasterWorld discussion forums -- which frequent
>>Graywolf Owns Local Search This Week #
Michael Gray, aka Graywolf, is out to corner the market on local search content this week. He"s posted the first four of an expected 20 interviews with local search marketers, collected in his post, "
>>Making Analytics Fun (No...really!) #
I often present local search marketing seminars with my friend Matt Bailey of Site Logic Marketing. One of his best sessions is on web analytics and he"s finally taken one of his best slides and turne
>>Nofollow for Ads? #
Yvo Schaap today writes: The search engines have become the gatekeepers of the internet. As a webmaster -- if you don"t play along by their rules, you won"t be getting any high rankings: the so ca
>>Citysearch Bolstering Local Ad Sales Teams #
Citysearch is pulling out the big guns to compete in the local search ad arena. The IAC-owned company just opened a new sales office in Atlanta, and expects to have 180 people in the new location by J
>>Googlebombs Defused #
It seems that Google"s Web spam team is sick and tired of "Googlebombs," the practice of linking an unflattering phrase to a person"s name to make a (usually political) statement. The classic example,
>>Paid Links That Are Truly Undetectable #
Posted by randfishMr. Cutts recently wrote a story about so-called "undetectable spam," in which he countered any paid link building service"s claim that it could be truly undetectable to se
>>A magazine I would love to read (Matt McAlister) #
A magazine I would love to read — There"s a magazine that I"d love to read if someone published it (yes, the print kind). Of course, it"s about the Internet. It"s about the stack that makes